Evidence, with its limits visible.
Every article must have an evidence field that states what the cited sources support and what they do not establish. Our narrative labels are not a formal GRADE assessment.
How an article becomes publishable.
- Check primary research or authoritative guidance for the relevant population and outcome.
- Separate mechanisms and associations from demonstrated causal effects.
- Write the limitations next to the practical advice. Label editorial exercise examples.
- Keep links to the original sources and record the source-check date.
- Require paragraph-by-paragraph human review before marking an article approved for public indexing.
AI and translation.
AI can assist research and drafting. It does not supply professional review. Another language is an adaptation for its audience, not a quota. Google does not automatically penalise a page merely because AI or translation tools were involved; value and spam policies matter.
Safety, attribution and corrections.
No unnamed medical reviewer is claimed. Educational tools describe their modeling assumptions and never present themselves as diagnostic systems. When a factual issue is identified, the owner should correct the source file, update the evidence note and record the material change. No professional review is implied by a source-check date.
Public launch checklist.
Before indexing: human review, a verified correction/contact channel, sources and links checked, public hosting enabled, the custom domain active, and Search Console ownership verified. FAQ content is for readers; it does not promise a Google rich result.